It was in Early Access, and had access to the entire communities feedback, through every step of the process. Below Zero does not break any new ground or try to do anything that hasn't been attempted before, and done, better, with more success.Īnd it wasn't striking out blindly, on its own. They already proved proof-of-concept for underwater survival exploration with Subnautica, and survival games, voiced protagonists, and stories, none of which are new or unique. It didn't break new ground, because it rode in on Subnautica's coattails, stood on its shoulders, and hoisted up by its praises, mechanics, solid gameplay loop, and established built-in fanbase and community. It didn't blindly strike out on its own path only to find itself met with a terrible fate. It wasn't boldly going where no one had gone before. I can tell you the reasons for me, personally, that drag Below Zero into the category of 'very, very bad'īecause you see, it isn't like Below Zero disappointed or didn't impress through any innocent fault of its own. Well, you may have better luck asking those questions on the Below Zero forum, but what I can do for ya, at least, is to answer your question myself here. I adored Hellsing for what it was in all its glory and for all its flaws. How's it going? Are you a fan of the original Hellsing, the Ultimate, or both? =) I haven't seen the reboot, can't say if it's good or bad, but then again never interested in it. Whenever i ask why BZ is so 'very very bad' i get silence and the negative reviews aren't any insightful either.

Marble blast gold pc bigfish games